Victory odes were commissioned in
order to memorialize the honor and legacy of an athlete. Thus they function as memorials to the
strength of the athlete, but also the skill of the poet. Both Pindar and
Bacchylides acknowledge the ability of their poetical prowess to preserve the
reputation of the athlete that they are writing about.
Pindar’s Olympian 2 is an example of
a poet praising his own poetic skill as he commemorates an athlete’s victory. In the opening lines, Pindar establishes
Theron, the champion, as the object of his praises for his victory in the
“four-horse chariot race” (line 5). Pindar furthers his report on Theron’s
greatness by linking him to, “an illustrious line” (7). This is typical of the
victory odes that have been examined. The poet links the champion to a mythical
story or theme, possibly by lineage, but Pindar also links people to famous
heroes who are from their same town. By connecting the champion to a famous
figure, story, or moral, the poet confers their legitimacy as a champion by
establishing a trustworthy connection that will evoke a positive image for a
reader. Then, as is typical of other victory poems, the majority of the middle
of the poem is spent recounting the mythical story, to which the champion has
been linked. After making mythical allusions, the poet typically returns to
praising the champion, as Pindar does in this poem. He writes that,
no city
within a hundred years produced
a man who
toward his friends is more
beneficent
in thought or free of hand
than Theron.
( 93-95)
Pindar praises the generosity of
Theron in this passage, and goes on to argue how greedier men mismanage their
wealth, unlike Theron. The Pindar praises not only the athletic skill of
Theron, but also his diplomatic qualities. In another poem, Pindar writes how
he does this in order to avoid making his audience jealous of the champion
(Pythian 1, strophe 5). Thus, Pindar commemorates not only the athleticism of
Theron, but also establishes his generosity for the cultural memory of the
populous. Since victory odes are commissioned in order to preserve the legacy
of the champion, it is important that Pindar paint a positive image of the
victor, both in the athletic arena, and also in his civil duties.
In this way, by praising Theron, but
also showing restraint in his praise, Pindar proves his poetic prowess. Of his
own skill, Pindar says,
Many swift
arrows lie in store within
the quiver
crooked beneath my arm
having a
voice that speaks to experts; but to grasp their gist
requires
interpreters. (83-5)
Pindar is praising his own poetic skill. He uses the image of
the arrow to describe how accurately he can praise and athlete and how focused
his work can be. The fact that the quiver is beneath his arm shows how the
skill is exclusively Pindar’s, but also how his ability to write powerful
poetry is always at the ready. Then Pindar claims that his work is so great
that is appeals to the very educated, but they even they need help to
understand all that he says. He also states that he can, “proclaim on oath
straightforward truth” (92). In this way, the victory ode serves not only to
commemorate the skill of the athlete, but also the skill of the poet. Pindar
praises his own ability to accurately capture the skill of Theron.
Bacchylides also simultaneously
relates the skill of the victor he is praising and his own poetic skill. In Ode
13, he addressed the victory of Pytheas in the pankration. In order to
establish his legitimacy and skill, Bacchylides compares Pytheas to the Trojan
war heroes Achilles and Ajax. Bacchlides also writes how Pytheas shows, “forth
the strength that gained the upper hand in combat with pankratiasts” (75-6),
and how he has achieved, “renown undying for a thing well done” (65).
Bacchylides is praising the skill of Pytheas in the ode, and also citing how
his legacy will last. The ability of the victory ode to solidify forever the
legacy of an athlete is so important. Bacchylides states how Pytheas deeds have
earned him “renown undying” (65), just like other great champions. At then end
of the ode, after recounting the story of Ajax and Achilles, he writes, “Excellence, visible to all, / does not grow dim in hiding” (176-7),
and how everyone ought to, “celebrate […] the glorious victory / of Pytheas”
(191-1). Bacchylides further seeks to praise Pytheas victory and commemorate
his legacy into the cultural memory of his town. The fact that his victory will
not grow dim serves to prove that the victory will endure forever through the
poem. Just as important as praising the skill of Pytheas is the notion that the
memory of his skill will endure forever.
Bacchylides, like Pindar, ends his
ode with a nod to his own poetic prowess, writting,
May
you look
With
favor on my gift – no slight one – to your son.
If
Kleio, giver of all bloom, has truly
Instilled
this in my mind,
Song
of delightful utterance
Will
herald forth his name to all the people. (226-31)
He praises his own prowess
when he notes that his poem is not slight. He is remarking what a great gift
his poem is, not only because it is beautifully written, but also because it
will preserve Pytheas’ name. He describes his poem as a gift, showing how he
views his work very highly. Bacchylides invokes a common trope of the victory
ode by invoking the Muse, Kleio, and saying that from her his poetic genius has
sprung. Bacchylides ends the poem with the idea that the poem will preserve and
spread Pytheas’ name. Since it is placed last in the poem, Bacchylides is
greatly emphasizing the importance of preserving Pytheas’ memory, and also how
his poem is able to do so.
Pindar and Bacchylides both praise
champions as well s their own poetic skill in their victory odes. In this way,
they preserve the legacy of an athlete, and also advance their own reputation
for being a great poet. The victory ode genre is one that places great
importance on the idea of preserving a legacy for all time. Both Pindar and
Bacchylides reference this desire of the athletes to be forever remembered.
You've covered all the key points here - now think about how you might tackle this in a longer work on the victory ode. How would you balance genre analysis with a close reading of a work?
ReplyDelete