Sappho: selection 24
Once again Love drives me on, that loosener of limbs,
bittersweet creature against which nothing can be done.
…...
But to you, Atthis, the thought of me has grown
hateful, and you fly off to Andromeda.
The concepts Carson mentions are
present in this fragment from Sappho. Firstly, Carson talks about how eros is
“sweetbitter” and how paradoxes like it explain eros. The first two lines
convey the simultaneous love and hate that is present in eros. The phrase,
“against which nothing can be done,” shows both the apprehension of the speaker
to love, but also the desire to love; it is futile to fight love, yet the
speaker wishes that love did not “drive them on”. Similarly, the use of the
verb “drives” implies that the speaker has to be prodded and pushed to love, even though they are resistant or weary.
Secondly, Carson talks about eros
being a verb. Thus it has motion and is dynamic. The fact that the beloved’s
(Atthis) opinion of the speaker has changed is an example of the fluidity of
love. What Atthis once loved, she now hates. In class we connected this idea to
lust and how Carson argues that love is not long-term commitments, but ever-changing
bursts of intense passion.
Thirdly, Carson defines eros such
that it depends on a lack or want of something. One cannot have the beloved,
and be experiencing eros; the old adage “you always want what you do not have”
harkens back to eros. Here, the speaker is lacking the beloved Atthis, and thus
the desire to have her is greater. The beloved scorns the speaker and flies
off, thus intensifying the desire for the speaker.
Archilochus: selection 36
In wretchedness I lie here, gripped by longing,
lifeless, with bitter pain by the gods’ will
pierced through the bones.
Carson’s ideas can be applied to this poem as well. First,
the idea of eros being “sweetbitter” is displayed. The speaker is talking about
love, but the diction used implies pain. The speaker feels wretched and
lifeless, and their pain is piercing. This exemplifies the bitter part of eros.
Love is understood to be sweet and happy, but the physical pain of the speaker
and emotional turmoil stands in opposition to those ideas, thus highlighting
the paradox present in eros.
Second, Carson defines eros as
lacking or wanting something. In this fragment the speaker is “gripped by
longing”, their desire and want is overpowering to the extent that they can
only lie in wretchedness. Carson, when she discusses the importance of the
triangle in her argument, highlights how something blocking love, can actually fuel desire.
That idea is present in the poem, because the separation of the speaker from
the beloved is increasing the desire, and pain, they feel.
You managed to expand on a good range of Carson's arguments into the analysis of both of the poems - would you be able to synthesize these in more specific passages from Carson? How would you take some of her knottier, more overtly poetic phrases to bring out further shades of this? Also, might it have some relation to the Greek ethics of balance and measure?
ReplyDelete