Sappho 24. (Frs.130)
Once again Love drives
me on, that loosener of limbs,
bittersweet creature
against which nothing can be done.
. . . . . . . . . .
But to you, Atthis,
the thought of me has grown
hateful, and you fly
off to Andromeda.
In the first two chapters of
Carson’ work, she surely emphasizes the characteristics and different aspects of
bittersweet in terms of love. She compares lovers’ mind to photographic
exposure by “creating a positive picture from a negative image.” In addition,
she concludes the first chapter by stating, “Love and hate converge within
erotic desire.” Then, she claims, “all
human desire is poised on an axis of paradox, absence and presence its poles,
love and hate its motive energies,” by the end of second chapter. Her concept
of bittersweet allows love and hate to coexist, and human desire seems to
disappear when the object is present, but it seems to reappear when it is
absent.
Carson’s concept of bittersweet can
be employed in this particular fragment of Sappho. Sappho mentioning the
reoccurrence of love that “loosens her limbs” can be interpreted as the “sweet”
part of being in love. However, Sappho suddenly switches her tone by stating
that “the thought of me has grown hateful and you fly off to Andromeda” to
describe the “bitter” aspect of love. The sudden transition from love to hate
can also be interpreted by Carson’s concept of paradox. Since Carson claims
that human desire seems to disappear when lover is at presence, Sappho’s desire
might have been gone because Atthis’ existence was no longer “driving” Sappho
on.
Archilochus 35-36
(Fr.191-193)
For such was the
passion of love that coiled itself beneath
my heart
and poured thick mist-across my eyes,
robbing me of my
tender senses
In wretchedness I lie
here, gripped by longing,
lifeless, with bitter
pain by the gods’ will
pierced through the
bones.
Overall this is very nice and clear. I want to point out though, that the use of the word "bittersweet" here is confusingly general. In addition, the phrase "a positive picture from a negative image" is less about good/bad and more of a metaphor about the creation of romantic imagery in the first place. Is this distinction clear? Carson is showing how conflicting poetic images show a contradictory nature at the heart of love itself - how does this work?
ReplyDelete