“for Xenophon son of Thessalos,
from Corinth,
victor in the stade race and the
pentathlon”
from Olympian 13 by Pindar
“Now for me the muse fosters in
her reserves of force the mightiest arrow:
in different matters different
men show greatness, but the utmost peak belongs to kings.”
from Olympian 1 by Pindar
Odes usually include a few basic
elements as a structure and then the poets add a few specific traits
to their Odes to make them stand out a little. These basic elements
include an introduction for the victor, the event they participated
in, and a reference to the muses. Olympian 13 has the victor,
Xenophon, and an introduction for him. The introduction includes his
name, some information about his family, and where he is from. In
this case, Xenophon is the son of Thessalos and is from Corinth. Odes
usually have the event they won and sometimes go into a little more
detail about how glorious his victory was or why he was so good at
that event. The poet also calls to the muses for inspiration and for
help with immortalizing the victor. An example of this is in
Olympian 1 by Pindar where he refers to the “mightiest arrow”
shot by the muse. The mightiest arrow here is Pindar, so he is being
used through the muse to show greatness in his victor.
The ability of the poet to give
immortality to the victor they are writing about is mainly reliant on
the skill of that poet to make an ode that will be preserved through
time and referenced by others to gain notoriety. If the poet is
good, their works will be kept around and seen by many people.
Examples of this are most of the poets in this book, Sappho, Pindar,
etc. If the poet is popular, their subject is immortalized, since
the works they are included in are remembered for a long time. If
the poet isn't good enough to be referenced in later works or their works are lost, even though they are good, their subjects
will be forgotten much sooner. Another aspect of immortalizing a
victor is the poet's ability to portray them as someone who had a
glorious victory. If the ode doesn't do a good job that, the victor
will not get much attention even if the poet is famous forever.
Not bad, just remember that the ode is a broader genre than the epinikia. Also, I saw that you didn't address the narrative features of the poem, which is where the most tricky interpretive aspects come in. Work on including that in the paper.
ReplyDelete