When one thinks Eminem and Archilochus, two different genres, music
choices, influences, and many other completely opposite genres come to mind.
After a little analysis though, one can truly find several connections between
the two. Eminem's "White America" is an address to him being attacked
for his work. In a sense, he is a victim in this work. This is interesting
because Archilochus portrays himself as a warrior, a tough and brave
personality. This dichotomy is very notable when one compares it against Archilochus
4. Archilochus talks about his shield and how he is not entirely dependent on
it. It is very interesting to compare the two perceptions because in the first,
he is complaining about how he is being attacked ("to choke, tightening
around my throat"). This line helps to intensify the victimized point of
the writer. He addresses the controversy that bloomed from “suburban kids”
listening to his music. This address shows the speaker’s dependency on the
opinion and environment around him. In contrast, Archilochus shows his
independence from his surroundings and how he is “safe.” The phrase “To hell
with it,” helps to exemplify this contrast between the two works because
Archilochus portrays a very carefree and bold position on his situation, even
though he may be in physical danger without his shield while Eminem is just
faced with much criticism. His reference to the rope definitely makes it seem
like he is going through much physical trouble, though.
Both works are
similar in their format though. Both authors speak in the first person and
convey their problems through exclamations and strong diction that helps to
really allow the reader to understand their situation. Even though both
situations are complete opposites of each other, the authors are able to convey
themselves in very similar, informal and strong ways.
I liked how you identified the relative position of each speaker. To get deeper into how this informs the poem, I'd suggest turning to the rhetorical structure of each. What does Archilochus get at when he talks about his shield being expendable? This can get you a little bit deeper into precisely how each respective poet 'defends' themselves.
ReplyDelete